Showing posts with label announcements. Show all posts
Showing posts with label announcements. Show all posts

26 Oct 2020

Shores. Logic of Gilles Deleuze: Basic Principles. Announcement and Preview

 

by Corry Shores

 

[Search Blog Here. Index-tags are found on the bottom of the left column.]

 

[Central Entry Directory]

[Corry Shores, entry directory]

[Shores, Logic of Deleuze 1, entry directory]

 

 

Announcement and Preview of

 

Corry Shores

 

The Logic of Gilles Deleuze:

Basic Principles

[Publisher’s book-webpage]

 

 
 
 
 

My book on Deleuze’s logic is now in press. A preview of the table of contents, acknowledgments, and introduction is available here:

https://www.academia.edu/44372079/The_Logic_of_Gilles_Deleuze_Basic_Principles

 

The publisher offers a preview of the first chapter here:

https://bloomsburycp3.codemantra.com/viewer/5f4e5a6fdc0e82000176fab1

 

 

Here is the publisher’s webpage for the book:

https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/the-logic-of-gilles-deleuze-9781350062252/

 

And here is an Amazon.com link:

The Logic of Gilles Deleuze: Basic Principles (Bloomsbury Studies in Continental Philosophy)

 

 

 

I thank a number of people in the acknowledgements (also see below). But here on this blog post I want to especially thank readers of this blog who have helped me on the book and supported me throughout the process, including Clifford Duffy, Terrance Blake, and Scott Wollschleger.

 

 

 

Full Acknowledgements:

This book was first made possible by Roland Breeur, who recommended me to the person who became one of my main editors, Liza Thompson. Much of what I know about philosophy and how it should be conducted, I learned from Prof. Breeur. And Liza, along with my other editors, Frankie Mace and Lucy Russell, have extended to me an incredible amount of generosity with the scheduling for the book. It never would have made it without their help, so I thank you all very much.

The basic content of the book was first made possible by the participants and organizers of the 2014 Paraconsistent Reasoning in Science and Mathematics conference at Ludwig Maximilian University: Peter Verdée, Holger Andreas, David Ripley, Graham Priest, Diderik Batens, Fenner Tanswell, Marcos Silva, Bryson Brown, Hitoshi Omori, Heinrich Wansing, Andreas Kapsner, Cian Chartier, Franz Berto, Itala Maria Loffredo D’Ottaviano, Zach Weber, João Marcos, Luis Estrada-González, Nick Thomas, Maarten McKubre-Jordens, Maria Martinez, Diego Tajer, and Otávio Bueno. They graciously allowed me to present, despite being quite incapable with logic, and they afterward did much to help me begin my project. Peter Verdée and Holger Andreas edited an edition of the proceedings for Springer, and they were kind enough to include my paper in it, the text of which is partly used here. I thank everyone for getting me started in non-classical logics, which still I love to this day.

I could not have written this book without the enduring, loving support of my wife, Gülben Salman. Her sacrifices and efforts are the reason I was able to do all the work necessary here. As a philosopher herself, she also made substantial contributions throughout the whole compositional process, and I cannot thank her enough. Gülben, I dedicate this book to you. I also thank Yasin Ceylan, Aziz Fevzi Zambak, Deniz Yılmaz Zambak, Aret Karademir, Hikmet Ünlü, Bolkar Özkan, Scott Wollschleger, Kurt Ozment, Samet Bağçe, Karen Vanhercke, Vykintas Baltakas, along with my family, Patricia, Ebbie Victor, Fatma, Hasan, Ebbie Paul, Brandon, Aimee, Mandy, Austin, and Joseph for the companionship, support, and advice they gave me all throughout.

Certain parts specifically benefited from help I received from other scholars. Oğuz Akçelik reviewed the logic parts (and any mistakes are mine). Many of the cinema parts (Chapters 4, 7, 8) were made possible by the guidance and teaching of Ahmet Gürata. The section on Plato in Chapter 8 was improved with Hikmet Ünlü’s expert assistance, and his instruction in Ancient Greek proved indispensable for working through the Stoic material in Chapter 5. Dorothea Olkowski taught me about intuitionism and its importance in Deleuze’s philosophy, so all of Chapter 6 was made possible by her writings and comments, and also she reviewed and made suggestions on most of Chapter 5. Roland Breeur’s work on imposture influenced much of what I write on the Falsifier in Chapter 8, and he reviewed and made suggestions for both Chapters 7 and 8. Along the way, I also received help with interpretation, sourcing, and translation from Antoine Dolcerocca, Terence Blake, Clifford Duffy, Roger Vergauwen, Julie Van der Wielen, Griet Galle, Iain McKenzie, Guillaume Collet, and Steven Spileers. Meriç Aytekin contributed much to the sourcing in Chapter 2, and Çi̇si̇l Vardar, to Chapter 1. At the beginning stages, my project benefitted from the comments provided by anonymous referees and from Ronald Bogue. I am very grateful to them. And I have taken great inspiration from the work of Jeffrey Bell, who has pioneered this particular field of study and whose advice I deeply appreciate. I am also heavily indebted to the archivists, transcribers, and translators (listed in the bibliography, but let me here mention Richard Pinhas) who have made Deleuze’s courses accessible. I thank everyone mentioned here so very much.

And many of the logic parts were improved through my correspondences and conversations with Graham Priest. His philosophy is the original inspiration for this book, and he has been nothing but the most generous and supportive toward this project. I thank him for patiently and thoroughly answering all of my questions about his writings and ideas. The philosophical world is so much better because of him, and I will always be deeply grateful.

I also could not have completed this book without the support and understanding of my colleagues at the Middle East Technical University: Halil Turan, Barış Parkan, Murat Baç, David Grünberg, Ayhan Sol, Samet Bağçe, Elif Çırakman, Mehmet Hilmi Demir, Aziz Fevzi Zambak, Fulden İbrahimhakkıoğlu, Yasin Ceylan, Teo Grünberg, Ahmet İnam, Ertuğrul Rufayi Turan, Refik Güremen, James Griffith, Selma Aydın Bayram, Dilek Başar Başkaya, Ercan Erkul, Gülizar Karahan Balya, Hikmet Ünlü, Erdinç Sayan, and Tahir Kocayiğit. (Ayhan Sol helped me especially with freeing up my scheduling for more time to write.)

Many students in my classes and seminars have contributed ideas and insights to this book, including: Bolkar Özkan, Gürkan Kılınç, Ilgın Aksoy, Yıldırım Bayazit, Faik Tekin Asal, Ekin Demirors, Hazal Babur, Tanayça Ünlütürk, Aybüke Aşkar, Meli̇ke Başak Yalçın, Ulaş Murat Altay, Sedef Beşkardeşler, Toprak Seda Karaosmanoğlu, İlkyaz Taşdemir, Çınar Uysal, Handan Ağirman, Tunahan Akbulut, Yasemin Karabaş, Aybüke Aşkar, Mahsasadat Shojaei, Umut Kesi̇kkulak, Ayşe Pekdiker, Seyran Sam Kookiaei, Atakan Botasun, Esra Saçlı, Firuza Rahimova, Sona Mustafayeva, İrem Kayra Özdemir, Erkan Özmacun, Ezel Ortaç, Rada Nur Ergen, and Yiğit Baysal. I thank all of you for your interest in these topics, for your original philosophical thinking, and for helping me interpret the texts.

And finally, I thank the following publishers and journals who granted me permission to reprint texts and figures (and additionally, I thank their blind referees, who helped me improve the articles):

Tijdschrift voor Filosofie / Peeters Publishers. (“The Primacy of Falsity: Deviant Origins in Deleuze.” TijdschriftVoorFilosofie 81 (2019): 81–130).

Routledge. (“Affirmations of the False and Bifurcations of the True: Deleuze’s Dialetheic and Stoic Fatalism.” In Deleuze and Guattari’s Philosophy of Freedom: Freedom’s Refrains, edited by Dorothea Olkowski and EftichisPirovolakis, 178–223. New York: Routledge, 2019.)

Springer. (“Dialetheism in the Structure of Phenomenal Time.” In Logical Studies of Paraconsistent Reasoning in Science and Mathematics, edited by Holger Andreas and Peter Verdée, 145-157. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016.)

Deleuze and Guattari Studies / Edinburgh University Press. (“In the Still of the Moment: Deleuze’s Phenomena of Motionless Time.” Deleuze Studies 8, no. 2 (2014): 199–229.)

 

 

Shores, Corry. The Logic of Gilles Deleuze: Basic Principles. London: Bloomsbury, 2020.

[Publisher’s book-webpage]

 

 

 

 

.

21 Dec 2011

Blog Hyperlinking Now Complete

by Corry Shores
[Search Blog Here. Index-tags are found on the bottom of the left column.]

[Central Entry Directory]
[Entry Directory of Blog Announcements]

Pirates & Revolutionaries and Deleuze Cinema Project are now both completely linked between and within themselves by means of a central entry directory. Something like a circulatory system where blood from all parts of the body flows to the heart from where it flows to all parts of the body, the central entry directory and all the postings' links to it allow us to go from any posting to any other in a directed way. Have fun, and I hope it helps you somehow. It has proven a huge benefit to my own writing.

-Corry



.
.
.
.

27 Apr 2010

Updated Deleuze Cinema Movie Lists

[Search Blog Here. Index-tags are found on the bottom of the left column.]

[Central Entry Directory]
[Entry Directory of Blog Announcements]

We have updated the Deleuze Cinema Movie lists. The prior versions listed the movies as they are found in the indexes of the English translations of Cinema I and Cinema II. This new update reflects our effort to locate the movies, and so now there are corrections (both to our prior typographical errors as well as to mistakes in the translations) and there is also additional information included. For example, in many cases the titles are provided in their untranslated form.





12 Sept 2009

Ecstasy and Dance Infinity: Richard Stadler’s Body Cosmic (New Directions, continued)


by Corry Shores
[Search Blog Here. Index-tags are found on the bottom of the left column.]

[Central Entry Directory]
[Entry Directory of Blog Announcements]



New Dirctions, continued

Ecstasy and Dance Infinity:

Richard Stadler’s Body Cosmic



Co-contributor Richard Stadler will begin discussions on dance meditation. He is a professional dancer who specializes in ecstatic expressionism.

Richard uncovers knowledge of our body’s cosmic spiritual dance. Ecstasy. It opens our awareness: to oneness, health, and elevation.

We will follow Richard’s insights. Our commentary takes a Deleuzean Spinozist perspective. What can a dancing body do? What is the one underlying divine substance that ecstatic dance expresses? How are bodies affectual and affected? What is the pure positivity of ecstasy? Do our body’s dances express God’s infinite? How can we incorporate this knowledge into our daily practice?



Look here for videos of his works. And thanks Rich for expanding the scope of our discussions.



3 Sept 2009

New Directions

.

by Corry Shores
[Search Blog Here. Index-tags are found on the bottom of the left column.]

[Central Entry Directory]
[Entry Directory of Blog Announcements]

.

.

.

Some new directions, discovered while journeying away from blogging.

.

.

.

.

Matt Lee and Temporality

.

.

Matt Lee at notebookeleven is discussing a fascinating idea called diamond time. If you can, check it out. Perhaps this sentence will convince you he is onto something:

There is no instant of the eternal return since it shatters the moment and explodes the instant, taking us directly into the daimon of time, diamond time.

I wonder, does Lee’s concept of diamond time relate to Deleuze’s crystal image? Might it help us better articulate the sort of phenomenal time unique to Deleuze’s own theory of phenomena? [Also, Lee’s site is fantastic, looks great, is intelligently and skillfully written- it really is worth a good look.]

.

.

.

The Raw Creativity of Clifford Duffy

.

.

Clifford Duffy is a poetry machine. And this is partly because he creates his media as well as his poems. His techniques are so innovative, and his poems so original and presented in such unique ways, that you wonder if he does not reinvent poetry with each new creation. Often his poems are jawdroppingly amazing. [See the sidebar “Amazing Clifford Duffy Poems” for some examples.] He as well provides such valuable resources for Deleuze research as this interview. [Many of his blogs can be found under the sidebar "Clifford Duffy’s Poetry of the Future: A Breakthrough in Genre.”] I will continue looking to him for inspiration, knowledge, new ideas and directions, art made in the raw and in this very instant, and a reminder of what Deleuze and Guattari really had in mind for how we should live and express. I am fortunate for the friendship he extends even from so far off, and it's an honor that I may return mine back to him. .

.

.

Spinoza’s Foci & Infinity of kvond

.

.

Spinoza is one of Deleuze’s fundamental influences. And one of his most interesting contributions to our understanding of Spinoza has much to do with Spinoza’s concept of infinity. Kvond’s work with Spinoza’s optics and lens craftsmanship is invaluable for a more probing look at Spinoza’s ideas. As well, his blog Frames /sing continues to forge new directions for our mind’s explorations. [See this current entry on Spinoza, cybernetics, chaos theory, and complexity theory for an example of how remarkable kvond’s work is.] Much of his work is the first of its kind, so I highly recommend checking into his blog when you can. I find his ideas to be refreshing and stimulating, and he articulates them in beautiful writing. So when we can, we will review more closely his work with Spinoza, to better obtain the fruits of following his original approach. My own work has grown substantially on account of his insights and generocity, so I look forward to learning from him and hopefully working with him in the near future.

.

.

.

Daniel Fineman and the Laughable
.
.

Daniel Fineman has some extraordinary new ideas about Nietzche, Deleuze, and “the laughable.” I am eager to share his work as widely as possible. As he releases it for public consumption, we will follow very closely. I heard him deliver a paper, and since then I have felt something vital that we can add to our readings of Deleuze. If we can make Deleuze laugh, we ourselves will become more creative readers of his texts.



Darren Ambrose and Deleuzean Creativity

.

.

I have encountered some incredible work on Deleuze’s aesthetics and theory of creativity by Darren Ambrose at Warwick. His research and writing is high calibre. As well, it is exciting. One fantastic project he has undertaken is applying Deleuze’s theory of artistic creativity to philosophical thought. Even from a quick glance (or listen), it is immediately evident that he will take us to new exciting conceptual realms. As well, he has covered much more ground than we have here on certain topics we have examined, especially regarding Deleuze’s work with Francis Bacon and French phenomenology.

.

.

.

Anarchy

.

.

I propose we explore anarchist theory. It occurred to me that Deleuze is an anarchist thinker (which might be obvious to many, or perhaps instead patently wrong.) What I have in mind is using anarchy as a metaphor to articulate something of the same family as wildness, lawlessness, chaos, disorder (and so forth) in Deleuze’s thinking. It might have more of the connotations we want for certain descriptions. If also we can articulate a Deleuzean anarchist politics, that would be fantastic too.

.

.

.

Kara Keeling and Afrofuturism

.

.

Kara Keeling is doing fascinating work with Afrofuturism, in particular with the music and theories of Sun Ra. There is such incredible freedom and creativity in this movement. It will be a source of inspiration as well as serve as an example of the liberty and power involved in Deleuzean creativity. Check out her blog Spittin’ Change. Currently she posted some of the Foucault – Chomsky debate.

.

.

.

Deleuze the Phenomenal Theorist

.

.

As well, we will continue our project of elevating Deleuze to equal ground with Husserl, not as an “anti-phenomenologist,” but as a competing theorist of phenomena. There are problems in Husserl’s system that Deleuze’s theory handles skillfully. Darren Ambrose’s work has convinced me to focus again on Deleuze's aesthetics, for this project.

.

.

.

.

.

Blog recommences after the second week of September.

.

.

.

.