[Search Blog Here. Index-tags are found on the bottom of the left column.]
[Central Entry Directory]
[Husserl Entry Directory]
Lines of Times
II
The Suspension of Objective Time, The Temporal Object, The Phenomenology of Objectivation and its Aporiae
No. 26
On the Hypothesis: That Perceptions Include the “Temporal Determination” Actually Now, Which, However, Continually Changes, and That Primary Memory Has the Significance of the Abiding of These Perceptions
Paragraph 188
We perceive something, call it a. We perceive it at a particular time point, called t. But a carries on through time. New time-moments add to it. That modifies it. But we note here that these time-points are not best thought-of discretely. Husserl will then uses a line to symbolize their continuity rather than discretion:
In the at, the t belongs directly to the a. Now what is peculiar to this situation is that a new t attaches itself, in an appropriate manner, to each moment of consciousness. The at remains (“for a time”) in consciousness, but consciousness is always a new consciousness, a consciousness that continually undergoes temporal change – that is, a consciousness that continuously confers a new now, a new t. But the new t is not conferred in such a way that it would sever the t from the at. Rather at continuously takes on ever new “t”s, and each new t is related to the preceding formation just as the original t is related to a. Accordingly:
at(at)t1 ((at) t1)t2 . . .
But the symbolism is poor, since this is a process of continuous modification. Something on this order might be better, then:
at_____t1 ,
where, however, each ideal step between t and t1 represents a t that is the t of the whole preceding process. (215a.b)
No comments:
Post a Comment