http://piratesandrevolutionaries.blogspot.com/2017/02/luhtala-554-on-origin-of-syntactical.html]
by Corry Shores
[Search Blog Here. Index-tags are found on the bottom of the left column.]
[Central Entry Directory]
[Stoics, Stoic Logic, Stoic Semantics, Entry Directory]
[Luhtala's On the Origin of Syntactical Description in Stoic Logic, Entry Directory]
The topic which deals with states of affairs (πραγματα, pragmata) and significations (σημαινόμενa, semainomena) includes that of sayables (λεκτά, lekta), both those that are complete and propositions and syllogisms, and those which are incomplete, and active and passive predicates. They say that a sayable (λεκτόν,lekton) is what subsists in accordance with a rational presentation. Sayables, the Stoics say, are divided into complete and incomplete, the latter being ones whose expression is unfinished. Those are defective with the expression of which is unfinished, e.g. 'writes', for we ask, 'Who?' In complete sayables the expression is finished, e.g. 'Socrates writes.' So incomplete sayables include predicates, whereas ones that are complete include propositions, syllogisms, questions, and inquiries. [Diog. Laert. VII, 63, tr. Long/Sedley 1987: 196] (86a)
(1) the predicate is what is said of something or (2) the predicate is a state of affairs construed around one or more subjects, according to Apollodorus, or (3) the predicate is a defective sayable which has to be joined to a nominative case in order to yield a judgment. [Diog. laert. VII, 64) (86c)
No comments:
Post a Comment