by Corry Shores
[Search Blog Here. Index-tags are found on the bottom of the left column.]
[Central Entry Directory]
[Deleuze Entry Directory]
[Henry Somers-Hall, Entry Directory]
[Hegel, Deleuze, and the Critique of Representation, Entry Directory]
[Note: All boldface and underlining is my own. It is intended for skimming purposes. Bracketed comments are also my own explanations or interpretations.]
Henry Somers-Hall
Hegel, Deleuze, and the Critique of Representation.
Dialectics of Negation and Difference
Part 3: Beyond Representation
Chapter 7: Force, Difference, and Opposition
Subdivision 1: Introduction
Brief Summary:
We will examine Hegel’s writings on force and Schelling to see how he might reply to Deleuze’s critique of his representationalism, then we will examine Deleuze’s concept of non-oppositional difference.
Summary
In the previous chapter we compared Deleuze’s and Hegel’s interpretation of differential calculus, and we saw from it that Deleuze conceives there being a subrepresentational unconditioned and Hegel an infinite representational unconditioned.
What we note is that our comparison of Deleuze’s and Hegel’s different approaches were not related directly but rather mediated through their work on calculus and Kant’s antinomies. (187) In this chapter we will directly relate their approaches so to “determine what resources either position has to provide a critique of the other.” (187) We will focus on Hegel’s writings on force and Schelling "to provide a critique of Deleuze's dual ontology of virtual and actual”. (187) After that we examine Deleuze’s concept of non-oppositional difference.
Somers-Hall, Henry (2012) Hegel, Deleuze, and the Critique of Representation. Dialectics of Negation and Difference. Albany: SUNY.
No comments:
Post a Comment