Terence Blake, Translations and Commentaries on Deleuze / Guattari, entry directory

by Corry Shores

[Search Blog Here. Index tabs are found at the bottom of the left column.]

[Central Entry Directory]
[Stoicism, entry directory]
[Terence Blake, entry directory]

Entry Directory for

 

Terence Blake’s

 

Translation and Commentary of Deleuze, Guattari, and Deleuze & Guattari

 

 

DELEUZE, DOGS, AND SCHIZOS Comment of June 21, 2013 at 8:49 pm

 

KEZIZ!, Zizek Gets It Backwards (1): Deleuze’s “buggery” quote retranslated

 

NOTES ON DELEUZE’S “LETTER TO A SEVERE CRITIC” (1): against Zizek

 

No Cuts!: Deleuze and Hillman on Alterity

 

Deleuze and Shining

 

DIFFERENCE, EVENT, INTENSITY, AND IMMOBILE VOYAGE in a short text by Deleuze and Guattari

 

DELEUZE AND THE REDUCTION TO THE ANIMAL: the problem of “dogs”

 

DELEUZE AND DRUGS: against the marginals’ conformism

 

SCHIZOANALYSIS: “Never lose your grace”

 

English Transcript of Deleuze on JOY

 

DELEUZE ON DIALOGUE: DISCUSSION vs CONVERSATION

 

ON THE “OBSCURITY” OF CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY: the case of Foucault

 

BADIOU’S LETTER TO DELEUZE

 

ON THE INCIPIT TO DELEUZE AND GUATTARI’S “WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY?”

 

Deleuze on Leibniz’s Mannerism: “Rude Airbrushing” Revealed

 

IS OLD AGE A CONCEPT?: Notes on Deleuze and Guattari’s “What is Philosophy?” (1)

 

WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (2): the time of the question

 

MISTRUST THE CONCEPT: Notes on Deleuze and Guattari’s “What is Philosophy?” (3)

 

THREE SHADES OF CONCEPT: Notes on Deleuze and Guattari’s “What is Philosophy?” (4)

 

OLD AGE A TRANSCENDENTAL REALITY: Notes on Deleuze and Guattari’s WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY (6)

 

BLOODSHOT EYES AND VISION CONCEPTS: from indifference to disapproval of thinking

 

ANTI-PLATONISM: horizontal movement and actualising powers

 

LARUELLE’S BLINDSPOTS: Deleuze on style, heuristics, and the topography of thought

 

‘EXPLAINING A SENTENCE BY GUATTARI’ and ‘OBSTACLES TO UNDERSTANDING RECENT FRENCH PHILOSOPHY’

 

Terence Blake’s ‘ANTI-OEDIPUS PARAGRAPH 1: translation’ ‘... commentary’ and ‘...evaluation’

 

SALUT DELEUZE Graphic Novel (1): publisher’s summary

 

MUST WE BURN ANTI-OEDIPUS? on conceptual mutation

 

ENUNCIATIVE APPENDIX TO READING ANTI-OEDIPUS: from desiring machine to spiritual automaton

 

DELEUZE, ZIZEK, AND HELL: against philo-memes

 

ZIZEK, DELEUZE AND NEGATIVITY

 

The Deleuze/Zizek pact and Spike Jonze’s HER

 

ZIZEK ON THE LACAN/DELEUZE PACT

 

BADIOU, DELEUZE, ET LES ACCÈS À L’INFINI

 

DELEUZE ET BADIOU PLURALISTES: comparer l’incommensurable

 

DELEUZE/BADIOU: être ou ne pas être (ensembliste)

 

BADIOU, DELEUZE, ET LA NÉGATIVITÉ: épistémologique ou ontologique?

 

BADIOU, DELEUZE, ET LA NÉGATIVITÉ (2): logique paraconsistante et synthèse disjonctive

 

ENGLISH SUMMARY OF BADIOU, DELEUZE, AND THE ACCESS TO INFINITIES

 

BADIOU ON SPINOZA (2): Badiou’s reading of Deleuze’s reading of Spinoza

 

DELEUZE/BADIOU/INFINITY: an ambivalent comparison

 

DELEUZE/BADIOU/INFINITY (2): Cantor and the Absolute

 

JUNG/DELEUZE (2): Shadow, Anima, and Self as conceptual personae

 

JUNG/DELEUZE (3): re-naming, purging, and imaging

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (1): quasi-causal reading and non-standard noesis

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (2): strange loops and concrete universality

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (3): Laruelle’s Lapse into Scientism

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (4): dramatised prototypes and the high degree

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (5): Breakdown, Sickness, Negativity

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (6): the cerebral and the Absolute

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (7): the idiot and the private thinker

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (8): concepts all the way down

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (9): Metaphysics of the concept and its non-conceptual shadow

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (10): structural demarcation and a-structural exchanges

 

RReading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (11): The Deleuze/Guattari Parallax

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (12): Conversation versus Discussion

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (13): radical empiricism and pathological states

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (14): Old age, entropy, and modality

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (15): a close reading is a noetic reading

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (16): the introduction is not the beginning

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (17): Spectres and Personae (Deleuze and Derrida)

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (18): LEARN SPIRITS (Deleuze and Derrida II)

 

Reading Laruelle’s TETRALOGOS (4): Deleuzos

 

DELEUZE AND ALIEN (1): Dreams, Gothic, and the Sublime

 

DELEUZE AND ALIEN (2): anomaly, hybrid, becoming, and bio-deconstruction

 

DELEUZE AND ALIEN (3): the Gothic fable deterritorialised

 

DELEUZE AND THE INFINITE: pluralism, immanence, the absolute, subjectivation

 

DELEUZE AND THE INFINITE: pluralism, immanence, the absolute, subjectivation

 

DELEUZE AND THE INFINITE (2): poetics, formalism, heuristics and testability

 

Reading WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? (19): What is thinking? (Deleuze and Laruelle)

 

What is « WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? »?: against noophobia

 

Laruelle as Deleuze’s scientistic double

 

CHANGING TRAJECTORIES: Deleuze, Badiou, Laruelle

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MY WRITINGS (4): GILLES DELEUZE

 

NOTE ON THE DELEUZE/HILLMAN CONVERGENCE

 

MORE ON THE DELEUZE/HILLMAN CONVERGENCE: a personal experience

 

Peter Kingsley’s CATAFALQUE (4): Deleuzian aspects

 

DELEUZE AGAINST DEBATE: a dogmatic self-invalidating meme

 

NOTHING TO DECLARE: the language of becoming in Deleuze and Hillman

 

DELEUZE AND HILLMAN: becoming-animal and the imaginal animal

 

ANTI-OEDIPUS (1): the first sentence

 

DELEUZE ET DUNE: éloge de la divergence

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MY WRITINGS (10): Deleuze and Jung (and Hillman)

 

THE JUNG/DELEUZE CONVERGENCE

 

 

Terence Blake’s ‘ON THE INCIPIT TO DELEUZE’S LOGIC OF SENSE’

 

Dialogue on LOGIC OF SENSE (1): A Love of Paradox and Strange Loops

 

ON THE PREFACE TO LOGIC OF SENSE (1): intuitive logic and its figurations

 

ON THE PREFACE TO LOGIC OF SENSE (2): negation and transformative re-conceptualisation

 

Dialogue on LOGIC OF SENSE (2): Wild Logic and Non-Standard Negation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.